©The National Board of
Accountants and Auditors, 2017
EXAMINATION : INTERMEDIATE LEVEL
SUBJECT : FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING000000
CODE : B2
EXAMINATION
DATE : WEDNESDAY,
3RD MAY, 2017
TIME
ALLOWED : THREE HOURS (2:00 P.M. – 5:00 P.M.)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
1. There are TWO sections in this paper. Sections A and B which comprise a total
of SIX questions.
2. Answer question ONE in Section A.
3. Answer ANY FOUR questions in Section B.
4. In total answer FIVE questions.
5. Marks are shown at the end of each question.
6. Calculate your answers to the nearest two decimal points where necessary.
7. Show clearly all your workings in respective answers where applicable.
8. This
question paper comprises 9 printed
pages.
_________________
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SECTION A
Compulsory Question
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
QUESTION 1
(a) International Financial Reporting Standard [IFRS 10] requires an entity that is a parent to prepare consolidated financial statements.
(i) Define control in the context of IFRS 10. (4 marks)
(ii) State the justification of full consolidation where the parent owns less than 100% of the ordinary shares of a subsidiary. (4 marks)
(b) On 1st July 2013, Halahala Company acquired 128,000 of Sosomola company’s 160,000 shares. The following Statements of Financial Position have been prepared as at 31st December 2016.
|
Halahala |
Sosomola |
|
TZS ‘000’ |
TZS ‘000’ |
Property, plant and equipment |
152,000 |
129,600 |
Investment in Sosomola |
203,000 |
- |
Inventory at cost |
112,000 |
74,400 |
Receivables |
104,000 |
84,000 |
Bank balance |
41,000 |
8,000 |
|
612,000 |
296,000 |
Ordinary share capital (TZS 1,000 each) |
100,000 |
160,000 |
Retained earnings |
460,000 |
112,000 |
Payables |
52,000 |
24,000 |
|
612,000 |
296,000 |
The following information is available:
(i) At 1st July 2013 Sosomola had a debit balance of TZS.11,000,000 on retained earnings.
(ii) Property, plant and equipment of Sosomola included land at a cost of TZS.72,000,000. This land had a fair value of TZS.100,000,000 at the date of acquisition.
(iii) An impairment review at 31st December 2016 shows that goodwill is impaired by 40%.
(iv) The inventory of Sosomola includes goods purchased from Halahala for TZS.16,000,000. Halahala invoiced those goods at cost plus 25%.
(v) The receivables at 31st December 2016 in Halahala include a receivable of TZS.7,800,000 from Sosomola, and the payables in Sosomola include an amount of TZS.6,000,000 payable to Halahala. The difference reflects a remittance made at 30th December 2016, not yet received and recorded in Halahala’s books.
REQUIRED:
Prepare
the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position of Halahala as at 31st
December 2016. (12
marks)
(Total: 20 marks)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SECTION B
There are FIVE questions. Answer ANY FOUR questions
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
QUESTION
2
The Statements of Profit or Loss and either Comprehensive Income and Statements of Financial Position of two manufacturing companies in the same sector are set out below:
Statement of Profit or Loss for the year
ended 31st December 2016
|
Filo |
Mona |
|
TZS ‘000’ |
TZS ‘000’ |
Revenue |
150,000 |
700,000 |
Cost of sales |
(60,000) |
(210,000) |
Gross profit |
90,000 |
490,000 |
Interest payable |
(500) |
(12,000) |
Distribution costs |
(13,000) |
(72,000) |
Administrative expenses |
(15,000) |
(35,000) |
Profit before tax |
61,500 |
371,000 |
Income tax expense |
(16,605) |
(100,170) |
Profit for the period |
44,895 |
270,830 |
Statement of Financial Position for the
year ended 31st December 2016
|
Filo |
Mona |
|
TZS ‘000’ |
TZS ‘000’ |
Assets |
|
|
Non-current assets |
|
|
Property |
|
500,000 |
Plant and equipment |
190,000 |
280,000 |
|
190,000 |
780,000 |
Current Assets |
|
|
Inventories |
12,000 |
26,250 |
Trade receivables |
37,500 |
105,000 |
Cash at bank |
500 |
22,000 |
|
50,000 |
153,250 |
Total Assets |
240,000 |
933,250 |
Equity and liabilities |
|
|
Ordinary share capital |
156,000 |
174,750 |
Retained earnings |
51,395 |
390,830 |
|
207,395 |
565,580 |
Non-current liabilities |
|
|
Long-term debt |
10,000 |
250,000 |
Current liabilities |
|
|
Trade payables |
22,605 |
117,670 |
Total equity and liabilities |
240,000 |
933,250 |
REQUIRED:
(a) Compare the performance of the two
companies in terms of profitability, liquidity and efficiency, supporting your
arguments with at least two ratios in each case.
(14 marks)
(b) State any FOUR additional pieces of
information that would have made your analysis above more useful, clearly
indicating the possible added value of such information. (6
marks)
(Total: 20 marks)
QUESTION 3
(a) Briefly discuss how do investors commonly use (analyse) free cash flow to value a firm and how best should cash flow statements be disclosed to enable the analysis.
(5 marks)
(b) The comparative Statements of Financial Position for Clay Company show the following information:
|
31-12-2016 |
31-12-2015 |
||
|
TZS ‘000’ |
TZS ‘000’ |
TZS ‘000’ |
TZS ‘000’ |
Non-Current assets |
|
|
|
|
Building |
0 |
|
29,750 |
|
Accumulated depreciation on building |
0 |
0 |
6,000 |
23,750 |
Equipment |
45,000 |
|
20,000 |
|
Accumulated depreciation on
equipment |
2,000 |
43,000 |
4,500 |
15,500 |
Patent |
|
5,000 |
|
6,250 |
Total non-current assets |
|
48,000 |
|
45,500 |
Current Assets |
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
33,500 |
|
13,000 |
Accounts receivable |
12,250 |
|
10,000 |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
3,000 |
9,250 |
4,500 |
5,500 |
Inventory |
|
12,000 |
|
9,000 |
Investments |
|
0 |
|
3,000 |
Total current assets |
|
54,750 |
|
30,500 |
Total Assets |
|
102,750 |
|
76,000 |
Non-current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
Long-term notes payable |
|
31,000 |
|
25,000 |
Total non-current liabilities |
|
31,000 |
|
25,000 |
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
5,000 |
|
3,000 |
Dividends payable |
|
0 |
|
5,000 |
Notes payable, short-term
(nontrade) |
|
3,000 |
|
4,000 |
Total current liabilities |
|
8,000 |
|
12,000 |
Total Liabilities |
|
39,000 |
|
37,000 |
Equity |
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
43,000 |
|
33,000 |
Retained earnings |
|
20,750 |
|
6,000 |
Total Equity |
|
63,750 |
|
39,000 |
Total Equity & liabilities |
|
102,750 |
|
76,000 |
Additional data related to 2016 are as follows:
(i) Equipment that had cost TZS.11,000,000 and was 40% depreciated at time of disposal was sold for TZS.2,500,000.
(ii) TZS.10,000,000 of the long-term note payable was paid by issuing common stock.
(iii) Cash dividends paid were TZS.5,000,000.
(iv) On January 1st 2016, the building was completely destroyed by floods. Insurance proceeds on the building were TZS.30,000,000 (net of TZS.2,000,000 taxes).
(v) Investments (available-for-sale) were sold at TZS.1,700,000 above their cost. The company has made similar sales and investments in the past.
(vi) A long-term note for TZS.16,000,000 was issued for the acquisition of equipment, and the remaining balance was acquired in cash.
(vii) Interest of TZS.2,000,000 and income taxes of TZS.6,500,000 were paid in cash.
REQUIRED:
Prepare
a Statement of Cash Flows using indirect method. Flood damage is unusual and infrequent in
that part of the country. (15
marks)
(Total: 20 marks)
QUESTION 4
(a) IAS 2: Inventories require that inventories are valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value.
REQUIRED:
State
the rationale for such a requirement. (2
marks)
(b) Malyimu retailers had the following figures of reported profit before tax:
Year |
Profit (TZS) |
2014 |
27,200,000 |
2015 |
28,400,000 |
2016 |
24,000,000 |
Analysis of inventories shows that certain errors were made with the following results:
Date |
Incorrect inventory figure (TZS) |
Correct inventory figure (TZS) |
December 31, 2014 |
4,800,000 |
5,680,000 |
December 31, 2015 |
5,600,000 |
4,680,000 |
REQUIRED:
Calculate the
corrected profit before tax figures (where applicable) for the years 2014, 2015
and 2016. (6
marks)
(c) Wakali Limited (WL) is engaged in the manufacturing and sale of textile machinery. The following draft extracts of the Statement of Financial Position and the Statement of Profit or Loss for the year ended 31st December 2016 have been provided:
Statement
of Financial Position
|
2016 |
2015 |
|
TZS ‘000’ |
TZS ‘000’ |
Property, Plant and Equipment |
189,000 |
130,000 |
Retained earnings |
166,000 |
108,000 |
Statement
of Profit or Loss
|
2016 |
2015 |
|
TZS ‘000’ |
TZS ‘000’ |
Profit before taxation |
90,000 |
120,000 |
Taxation |
27,000 |
36,000 |
Profit after taxation |
63,000 |
84,000 |
The following additional information has not been taken into account in the preparation of the above financial statements:
· Cost of repairs amounting to TZS.20 million was erroneously debited to the machinery account on 1st April 2015. The estimated useful life of the machine is 10 years.
· On 1st January 2016, WL reviewed the estimated useful life of its plant and revised it from 5 years to 7 years. The plant was purchased on 1st January 2014 at a cost of TZS.70 million.
Depreciation is provided under the straight line method. Applicable tax rate is 30%.
REQUIRED:
Prepare relevant extracts (including 2015 comparatives) for the year ended 31st December 2016 related to the following:
(i) Statement of Financial Position. (6 marks)
(ii) Statement of Profit or Loss. (6 marks)
(Total:
20 marks)
QUESTION 5
(a)
Damari Limited is a company involved in building wind
farms in Singida. The financial controller
has asked you, a newly qualified CPA for some help in correctly accounting for
Property, Plant and Equipment (PPE) within the company for the financial year
ended 31st December 2016.
The following costs have occurred on a wind farm site:
|
TZS ‘000’ |
Preparation of site |
80,000 |
Annual maintenance once operational |
30,000 |
VAT on materials (recoverable) |
120,000 |
Staff training on correctly operating the wind farm once operational |
25,000 |
Import duty on materials purchased |
28,000 |
Initial surveying of site |
40,000 |
Project manager’s salary to build and manage the wind farm |
140,000 |
Wages of employees to build the wind farm |
300,000 |
Annual wages of employees once the wind farm is operating |
100,000 |
Testing costs |
60,000 |
Materials purchased for wind farm net of VAT |
250,000 |
Discount received on materials purchased |
33,000 |
REQUIRED:
(i) Calculate the amount that should be capitalized as Property, Plant and Equipment for the above wind farm. (3 marks)
(ii) In accordance with IAS 16 – Property, Plant & Equipment explain the accounting treatment allowed for the measurement of PPE:
a. At recognition; (1.5 marks)
b. After recognition. (1.5 marks)
(iii) In the context of IAS 16 – Property, Plant & Equipment:
a. Discuss what is meant by the term ‘fair value’. (1.5 marks)
b. How can the fair value of a building be determined? (1.5 marks)
(b) Damari Limited’s head office building is the
only building it owns. Using
professional valuers, it revalued this building on 1st January 2016,
at TZS.2,100,000,000. Damari Limited has
adopted a revaluation policy for building from this valuation date and has
decided that the original useful life of buildings has not changed as a result
of the revaluation. The building was
acquired on 1st January 2006.
The cost of the building on acquisition was TZS.2,500,000,000 and the
accumulated depreciation to 31st December 2015 amounted to TZS.
500,000,000. The depreciation up to 1st January 2016 was depreciated
evenly since acquisition. The professional
valuer believes that the residual value on the building would be
TZS.600,000,000 at the end of its useful life.
REQUIRED:
In
accordance with IAS 16 – Property, Plant
& Equipment:
(i) State how should the depreciable amount of an asset be allocated.
(1 mark)
(ii) State how often should the residual value and the useful life of an
asset be reviewed. (2 marks)
(iii) Calculate the depreciation amount of the building for the year ended 31st December 2016 based on the information provided in the above scenario.
(8
marks)
(Total: 20 marks)
QUESTION 6
(a) Consider the following list of events that occurred between 31st December 2016 (reporting date) and 31st March 2017 (date of authorization of financial statement for issue) and decide which one you would classify as adjusting events and which are non-adjusting events. You should also state clearly the treatment that you are proposing in each case.
(i)
The receipt of net proceeds of sales TZS.12,600,000 for
inventory items whose net realizable value was estimated (31st
December 2016) at TZS.12,000,000 and cost was TZS.12,500,000.
(ii)
Proposed dividend made by the director’s board meeting
on 31st January 2017, for a total of TZS.160,000,000.
(iii)
Enactment in February 2017 of a new customer protection
law that requires the company to enhance disclosures in labels on its products
(including translating them to Kiswahili
language). This, apart from
increasing labelling costs, makes labels costing the company TZS.14,000,000
useless.
(iv)
The declaration of bankruptcy for a debtor. An
allowance of TZS.15,000,000 was set against his doubtful debt at 31st
December 2016. The total amount
receivable before the allowance was TZS 42,000,000 and as a result of the
bankruptcy declaration directors estimate that only TZS.12,000,000 can be
recovered.
(v)
The chairman of the board of directors got appointed on
1st January 2017 as a member of parliament (by the president). The
appointment automatically requires him to relinquish her position as board
member and chair. Processes to fill her
position in the board are estimated to cost TZS.15,000,000.
Your answer should be in the following format:
Item |
Classification |
Treatment |
(i) |
|
|
(ii) |
|
|
(iii) |
|
|
(iv) |
|
|
(v) |
|
|
(10 marks)
(b) Gambini Company is preparing its Financial Statements for the year ended 31st December 2016.
The following matters are all outstanding at the year end.
(i) Gambini is facing litigation for damages from a customer for the supply of faulty goods on 1st December 2016. The claim which is for TZS. 500,000,000, was received on 15th January 2017. Gambini’s legal advisors consider that Gambini is liable and it is likely that this claim will succeed. On 25th January 2017, Gambini sent a counter-claim to its suppliers for TZS.400,000,000. Gambini’s legal advisors are unsure whether or not this claim will succeed.
(ii) Gambini’s sales director, who was dismissed on 15th December 2016, has lodged a claim for TZS.100,000,000 for unfair dismissal. Gambini’s legal advisors believe that there is no case to answer and therefore think it is unlikely that this claim will succeed.
(iii) Although Gambini has no legal obligation to do so, it has habitually operated a policy of allowing customers to return goods within 28 days, even where those goods are not faulty. Gambini estimates that such returns usually amount to 1% of sales. Sales in December 2016 were TZS.400,000,000. By the end of January 2017, prior to the drafting of the financial statements, goods sold in December for TZS.3,500,000 had been returned.
(iv) On 15th December 2016 Gambini announced in the press that it is to close one of its divisions in April 2017. A detailed closure plan is in place and the costs of closure are reliably estimated at TZS.300,000,000, including TZS.50,000,000 for staff relocation.
REQUIRED:
State, with
reasons, how the above matters should be treated in Gambini’s financial
statements for the year ended 31st December 2016. (10
marks)
(Total: 20 marks)
___________p___________
SUGGESTED SOLUTIONS
B2 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
MAY 2017
ANSWER 1
(a) Control and Consolidation.
(i)
Control
An investor
controls an investee when it is exposed, or has rights, to variable returns
from its involvement with the investee and has the ability to affect those
returns through its power over the investee.
In other words,
the investor has control over the investee when it has all of the following:
§
Power over the investee
§
Exposure, or rights, to variable returns from
its involvement with the
investee; and
§
The ability to use its power over the investee
to affect the amount of the investor’s returns.
(ii)
Consolidated
The full
consolidation is justified by the control that the parent entity has over the
assets of the subsidiary. The definition
of assets speaks of control rather than ownership, thus even if an entity
literally owns less than 100% of another entity, as long as it has control over
such entity, it should report the assets of such entity as assets of the group.
(b) Halahala
Halahala Group
Consolidated Statement
of Financial Position as at 31 December 2016
|
TZS ‘000’ |
Assets |
|
Non-current assets |
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
(152,000 + 129,600 + 28,000 (W1)) |
309,600 |
Goodwill (W2) |
36,840 |
Current assets |
|
Bank (41,000 + 8,000 +1,800) |
50,800 |
Receivables (104,000 + 84,000 – 7,800) |
180,200 |
Inventory (112,000 + 74,400 – 3,200 (W6)) |
183,200 |
|
760,640 |
Equity and liabilities |
|
Capital and reserves |
|
Share capital |
100,00 |
Retained earnings (W4) |
530,640 |
|
630,640 |
Non-controlling interest (W3) |
60,000 |
Current liabilities (52,000 + 24,000 – 6,000) |
70,000 |
|
760,640 |
WORKINGS
1.
Net assets
of Sosomola |
|
|
|
|
Reporting date TZS ‘000’ |
Acquisition date TZS ‘000’ |
Post acquisition TZS ‘000’ |
Share capital |
160,000 |
160,000 |
|
FV adj. on Land |
28,000 |
28,000 |
|
Retained earnings |
112,000 |
(11,000) |
123,000 |
|
300,000 |
177,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
2. Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
TZS ‘000’ |
Cost of shares |
|
|
203,000 |
Less Net assets acquired (80% x 177,000 (W1)) |
(141,600) |
||
|
61,400 |
||
Less: Impairment [40%] |
24,560 |
||
Goodwill at 31/12/2016 |
36,840 |
||
|
|
|
|
3.
Non-controlling interest |
|
||
|
|
|
TZS ‘000’ |
Share of net assets (20% x 300,000 (W1)) |
60,000 |
||
|
|
|
|
4.
Retained earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
TZS ‘000’ |
|
Halahala |
|
460,000 |
|
Prov for Unrealized Profit (W5) |
(3,200) |
||
Sosomola’s post acq. RE (80% x 123,000 (W1)) |
98,400 |
||
Goodwill impairment |
|
(24,560) |
|
|
|
530,640 |
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Unrealised Profits |
|
|
|
Selling price % |
TZS ‘000’ |
|
|
Cost 125 |
16,000 |
|
|
GP (100) |
(12,800) |
|
|
25 |
3,200 |
|
|
ANSWER 2
(a) Comparative performance of Filo and Mona
Profitability:
Mona’s figures shows overall higher profitability ratios than Filo both in relation to sales and in relation to assets or investments. This is further confirmed by its ability to efficiently use assets [see the stock turn rate and the return on assets]
This could suggest Mona’s ability to both
- Attract premium paying customers
- Manage operating costs
Liquidity:
Filo’s ratios portrays greater liquidity compared to Mona. While this may be a good indicator of a stronger liquidity position in favour of Filo, it could also suggest efficient use of resources by Mona, by avoiding to keep excessive idle liquid assets, since it still has an adequate liquidity to meet maturing obligation [ a quick ratio just above 1]. The efficiency is further confirmed by the efficiency ratios
Efficiency:
Mona’s ratios, again, portrays better efficiency than Filo’s. Despite giving longer credit period to its customers, Filo still proves less efficient in ‘turning over’ the stocks.
Generally, therefore, staying within the information given, between the two companies, Mona has a better performance than Filo.
Supporting computations:
Relevant ratios |
Formula |
Filo |
Mona |
|
Profitability |
||||
Gross margin |
Gross profit/ Sales |
60% |
70% |
|
Profit margin |
Profit before interest and Tax/
Sales |
41.33% |
54.71% |
|
Return on Assets |
Profit before interest and Tax/
Total Assets |
25.83% |
41.04% |
|
Liquidity |
||||
Current ratio |
2.2119 |
1.302371 |
times |
|
Quick ratio |
1.68 |
1.08 |
times |
|
Efficiency |
||||
Rate of stock turnover |
Cost of sales/ average stock |
5 |
8 |
times |
Debtors collection period |
(Debtors *365 days)/sales |
91.25 |
54.75 |
days |
Assets Turnover |
Sales/ total assets |
0.625 |
0.750067 |
times |
(b) Additional information needed in the analysis, and the
indicative possible added value
- They number of years each of the companies have been in operation – could tell whether Mona is enjoying learning curve as compared to Filo. It could also be that Filo is in the entry phase, thus having to adopt market penetration strategies
- The nature of customers served - Much as they are both manufacturers, one could be concentrating on corporate customers and another small scale customers. These will affect the margins and efficiencies
- The trend of performance for the past years - This information could indicate whether the current year performance is typical of the performance in the past few years, or reflects improving/ worsening performance
§ Industry
averages - This information could assist in gauging the
performance against peers in the industry.
ANSWER 3
(a) For many investors, the core concept in
estimating free cash flow is the excess of a company’s operating cash flows
over its capital expenditure. Applying
free cash flow in intrinsic valuation methods, such as a discounted cash flow
model (DCF), is often considered to more appropriate than simply using the
disclosed operating cash flow. This is
because it considers the cash flows available to owners after funding the
investment (or reinvestment) needs of the business. To enable this analysis to be as precise as
possible, companies are encouraged to disclose separately cash flows that
increase operating capacity and those required to maintain it (some investors
refer to this as ‘maintenance capex’ vs ‘growth capex’). As well, these measures of a company’s cash
flow can be used as an indicator of financial strength, which may be useful to
investors analyzing a company’s ability to repay debt.
CLAY
CORPORATION
Statement of Cash Flows
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016
Cash flows from operating activities |
TZS.‘000’ |
TZS.‘000’ |
Net income (a) |
|
14,750 |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
Loss on sale of equipment (b) |
4,100 |
|
Gain from flood damage [(TZS30,000 + 2,000) – 29,750 - 6,000)] |
-8,250 |
|
Depreciation expense (c) |
1,900 |
|
Patent amortization |
1,250 |
|
Gain on sale of investments |
-1,700 |
|
Increase in Accts Rec (net) [(TZS12,250 – TZS3,000) – (TZS10,000 – TZS4,500)] |
-3,750 |
|
Increase in inventory |
-3,000 |
|
Increase in accounts payable |
2,000 |
-7,450 |
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
TZS7,300 |
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
Sale of investments |
TZS4,700 |
|
Sale of equipment |
2,500 |
|
Purchase of equipment (d) |
-20,000 |
|
Proceeds from flood damage to building |
32,000 |
|
Net cash provided by investing activities |
|
TZS 19,200 |
|
|
|
Cash flow from financing activities |
|
|
Payment of dividends |
(TZS5,000) |
|
Payment of short-term note payable |
-1,000 |
|
Net cash used by financing activities |
|
(TZS6,000) |
|
|
|
Increase in cash |
|
TZS20,500 |
Cash January 1,2016 |
13,000 |
|
Cash, December 31, 2016 |
TZS33,500 |
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information |
|
|
Cash paid during the year for: |
|
|
Interest |
TZS2,000 |
|
Income taxes |
6,500 |
|
|
|
|
Noncash investing and financing activities |
|
|
Retired note payable by issuing common stock |
TZS10,000 |
|
Purchased equipment by issuing note payable |
16,000 |
|
|
TZS26,000 |
|
|
|
|
Supporting Computations: |
|
|
(a) Ending retained earnings |
TZS20,750 |
|
Beginning retained earnings |
-6,000 |
|
Net income |
TZS14,750 |
|
|
|
|
(b) Cost |
TZS 11,000 |
|
Accumulated depreciation (40% x TZS11,000 |
-4,400 |
|
Book value |
6,600 |
|
Proceeds from sale |
-2,500 |
|
Loss on sale |
TZS4,100 |
|
|
|
|
(c) Accumulated depreciation on equipment sold |
TZS 4,400 |
|
Decrease in accumulated depreciation |
-2,500 |
|
Depreciation expense |
TZS1,900 |
|
|
|
|
(d) Beginning equipment balance |
TZS 20,000 |
|
Cost of equipment sold |
-11,000 |
|
Remaining balance |
9,000 |
|
ANSWER 4
(a) Rationale
for the ‘lower of cost or NRV valuation principle
The rationale is to avoid reporting inventory as an asset at a value that is higher than what they can really generate to the reporting entity. This is in line with the basic element of the definition of an asset, i.e. the probable flow of economic benefits to the entity.
(b) Malyim
In this situation, we have:
Year |
Opening stock |
Closing stock |
Net effect profit |
Correction required |
2013 |
NIL |
880,000 understated |
880,000 understated |
Add 880,000 to the reported profit |
2014 |
880,000 understated |
920,000 overstated |
1,800,000 overstated |
Deduct 1,800,000 from the reported profit |
2015 |
920,000 overstated |
NIL |
920,000 understated |
Add 920,000 to the reported profit |
The corrected profit figures are thus:
Year |
Original Profit TZS |
Correction required |
Corrected profit TZS |
2013 |
27,200,000 |
Add 880,000 to the reported profit |
28,080,000 |
2014 |
28,400,000 |
Deduct 1,800,000 from the reported profit |
26,600,000 |
2015 |
24,000,000 |
Add 920,000 to the reported profit |
24,920,000 |
(c) Wakali
Extracts of statement
of financial position as at:
|
31-Dec-16 TZS |
31-Dec-15 TZS |
PPE |
|
|
Original figure |
189,000,000 |
130,000,000 |
Wrong capitalized repair cost |
(20,000,000) |
(20,000,000) |
Accumulated depr on wrongly capitalized repair cost |
3,500,000 |
1,500,000 |
Extra depreciation charged |
4,000,000 |
- |
|
176,500,000 |
111,500,000 |
Retained earnings |
157,250,000 |
95,050,000 |
Extracts of statement of Profit/loss for
the year ended:
|
31-Dec-16 TZS |
31-Dec-15 TZS |
Profit before tax-originally reported |
90,000,000 |
120,000,000 |
Wrongly capitalized repair cost |
- |
(20,000,000) |
Extra depreciation (TZS4m + 2m) |
6,000,000 |
1,500,000 |
Corrected profit before tax |
96,000,000 |
101,500,000 |
Taxation |
28,800,000 |
30,450,000 |
Profit after tax |
67,200,000 |
71,050,000 |
Workings 1:
Extra depreciation
Plant cost |
70,000,000 |
Original useful life |
5 years |
Revised useful life |
7 years |
Depreciation charge before change |
14,000,000 |
Depreciation charge after change |
10,000,000 |
Extra depreciation charged 2016 |
4,000,000 |
Workings 2:
PAT
Profit after tax figures |
63,000,000 |
84,000,000 |
Wrongly capitalize repair cost |
- |
(20,000,000) |
Extra depreciation |
6,000,000 |
1,500,000 |
After Tax implications of the corrections |
4,200,000 |
(12,950,000) |
Corrected after tax figure |
67,200,000 |
71,050,000 |
Workings 3:
Retained earnings correction
|
TZS |
TZS |
Originally reported |
166,000,000 |
108,000,000 |
Effect of PAT adjustment |
(8,750,000) |
(12,950,000) |
Corrected Retained earnings figure |
157,250,000 |
95,050,000 |
ANSWER 5
(a)
REPORT
To: Financial Controller –
Damari Limited
From: Future Financial
Accountant
RE: IAS 16 – Property, Plant
& Equipment (PPE)
Date: April 2016
(i) The amount that can be capitalized for this wind farm is as follows: |
TZS‘000’ |
Preparation of site 80,000 Yes |
80,000 |
Annual maintenance once operational 30,000 no |
|
Vat on material (recoverable) 120,000 no |
|
Staff training on correctly operating the wind farm once operational
25,000 no |
|
Import duty on materials purchased 28,000 Yes |
28,000 |
Initial surveying of site 40,000 Yes |
40,000 |
Project manager salary to build and manage the wind farm 140,000 Yes |
140,000 |
Wages of employees to build wind farm 300,000 Yes |
300,000 |
Annual wages
of employees once the wind farm is operating 100,000 no |
|
Testing
costs 60,000 Yes |
60,000 |
Materials
purchased for wind farm net of vat 250,000 Yes |
250,000 |
Discount
received on materials purchased 33,000 Yes |
(33,000) |
Amount to be Capitalised |
865,000 |
(ii) a. Per paragraph 15 of IAS 16 at initial recognition, all items of PPE are recognized at cost.
b. Per paragraph 29 of IAS, two methods of valuing PPE after initial recognition are allowed. i.e.
(iii) a. Cost model i.e. PPE is carried at cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment
losses
b. Revaluation model i.e. PPE is carried at a revalued amount. The revalued amount is equal
to the fair value at date of revaluation less subsequent accumulated depreciation and
impairment losses.
(b)
(i) Per paragraph 6 of IAS 16, it should be allocated over its useful life
(ii) Per paragraph 51 of IAs 16 16, the residual value and the useful life of an asset shall be reviewed at least at each financial year end and if expectations differ from previous estimates, the change(s) shall be accounted for as a change in an accounting estimate in accordance with IAS 8 Accounting Policies, changes in Accounting estimates an errors.
(iii) The depreciation amount is as follows:
Working – Property, Plant
& Equipment |
Building |
Total |
Cost |
2,500,0000 |
2,500,000 |
-Accumulated depreciation |
(500,000) |
(500,000) |
Carrying Value b/d at 1st January 2015 |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
Revaluation Gain |
100,000 |
100,000 |
|
2,100,000 |
2,100,000 |
Depreciation-building-note1 |
(37,500) |
(37,500) |
Carrying Value c/d at 31st December 2015 |
2,062,500 |
2,062,500 |
Note 1
Buildings – original Cost 2,500,000
Buildings – original Accumulated depreciation 500,000
Accumulated depreciation/Cost = 20%
Building has been depreciated by 20% over 10 years (01.01.05 – 31.12.14) so annual rate of depreciation has been 2% i.e. 20% /10 years as asset has been depreciated evenly since acquisition. Therefore, the original useful life is 50 years i.e. 100%/2% and the remaining useful life is 40 years. Therefore, the remaining useful life is 40 years.
To calculate the new depreciation amount, we use the following depreciation formula revalued Cost of Asset – residual value i.e. 2,100,000 – 600,000 expected useful life of Asset 40 years depreciation = 37,500.
If you have any further queries, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Yours sincerely,
Financial Accountant
ANSWER 6
(a) Classification of events and respective treatments
Item |
IAS 10 classification |
Treatment |
(i) |
Adjusting |
Restate the inventory to cost, i.e. TZS 12,500,000 as it is lower than the NRV |
(ii) |
Non adjusting |
Disclose in the notes |
(iii) |
Non adjusting |
Do nothing, the loss [obsolete labels] will be expenses in 2017. |
(iv) |
Adjusting |
Adjust the allowance for doubtful debt to TZS 30,000,000 |
(v) |
Non-adjusting |
Do nothing |
(b) Gambini Ltd
(i) Customer Litigation – damage
§ Gambini’s legal advisors have confirmed that there is a legal obligation. This arose from the past event of the sale, on 1 December 2016 (i.e. before the year-en).
§ The legal advisors have confirmed that it is likely that the claim will succeed.
§ A reliable estimate of TZS 500,000,000 has been made.
§ Therefore, a provision of TZS 500,000,000 should be made.
§ About the Counter-claim, IAS37 requires that such a reimbursement should only be recognized where receipt is ‘virtually certain’. Since the legal advisors are unsure whether this claim will succeed no asset should be recognized in respect of this claim.
(ii)
Sales director
suit – unfair dismissal
In this case,
the legal advisers believe that success is unlikely (ie. Possible rather than
probable). Therefore, this claim meets
the IAS37 definition of a contingent liability.
The liability is a possible one, which will be determined by a future
court case or tribunal. It did arise
from past events (the dismissal had taken place by the year end).
This contingent liability should be disclosed in the financial statements
(unless the legal advisors believe that the possibility of success is in fact remote, in which case no disclosure would be necessary.
(iii)
Customers’
returns
Although there
is no legal obligation, a constructive obligation arises from Gambini’s past
actions. Gambini has created an
expectation in its customers that such refunds will be given.
As at the year
end, based on past experience, an outflow of economic benefits is probable.
A reliable
estimate can be made. This could be 1% x
400,000,000 but since the returns are now all in the actual figure of TZS
3,500,000 can be used.
Therefore, a
provision of TZS 3,500,000 should be made.
(iv)
Closure
announcement
§ A present obligation exists because at the year-end there is a detailed plan in place and the closure has been announced in the press.
§ An outflow of economic benefits is probable.
§ A reliable estimate of TZS 300,000,000 has been made.
§ However, IAS37 specifically states in respect of restructuring that any provision should include only direct expenses, not ongoing expenses such as staff relocation or retraining (paragraph 80 and 81). Therefore, a provision of TZS 250,000,000(300,000,000) – 50,000,000) should be made.
______________ 5 ______________
No comments:
Post a Comment