PAST PAPERS

Sunday, September 13, 2020

NBAA PAST PAPERS (B2 – FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING: ( MAY 2017 ) The National Board of Accountants and Auditors,

 

MAY 2017
Q & A

©The National Board of Accountants and Auditors, 2017

EXAMINATION               :     INTERMEDIATE LEVEL

                                                  

 

SUBJECT                           :     FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING000000

 

CODE                                 :     B2

 

EXAMINATION DATE  :     WEDNESDAY, 3RD MAY, 2017

 

TIME ALLOWED            :     THREE HOURS (2:00 P.M. – 5:00 P.M.)

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

 

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

 

1.                  There are TWO sections in this paper.  Sections A and B which comprise a total

of SIX questions.

 

2.         Answer question ONE in Section A.

 

3.         Answer ANY FOUR questions in Section B.

 

4.         In total answer FIVE questions.

 

5.         Marks are shown at the end of each question.

 

6.         Calculate your answers to the nearest two decimal points where necessary.

 

7.         Show clearly all your workings in respective answers where applicable.

 

8.         This question paper comprises 9 printed pages.

 

 

 

 

_________________


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SECTION A 

 Compulsory Question

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

QUESTION 1

 

(a)        International Financial Reporting Standard [IFRS 10] requires an entity that is a parent to prepare consolidated financial statements.

 

(i)                 Define control in the context of IFRS 10.                                        (4 marks)

(ii)               State the justification of full consolidation where the parent owns less than 100% of the ordinary shares of a subsidiary.                                   (4 marks)

 

(b)        On 1st July 2013, Halahala Company acquired 128,000 of Sosomola company’s 160,000 shares.  The following Statements of Financial Position have been prepared as at 31st December 2016.

           

 

Halahala

Sosomola

 

TZS ‘000’

TZS ‘000’

Property, plant and equipment

152,000

129,600

Investment in Sosomola

203,000

-

Inventory at cost

112,000

74,400

Receivables

104,000

84,000

Bank balance

41,000

8,000

 

612,000

296,000

Ordinary share capital (TZS 1,000 each)

100,000

160,000

Retained earnings

460,000

112,000

Payables

52,000

24,000

 

612,000

296,000

 

            The following information is available:

 

(i)                 At 1st July 2013 Sosomola had a debit balance of TZS.11,000,000 on retained earnings.

(ii)               Property, plant and equipment of Sosomola included land at a cost of TZS.72,000,000.  This land had a fair value of TZS.100,000,000 at the date of acquisition.

(iii)             An impairment review at 31st December 2016 shows that goodwill is impaired by 40%.

(iv)             The inventory of Sosomola includes goods purchased from Halahala for TZS.16,000,000.  Halahala invoiced those goods at cost plus 25%.

(v)               The receivables at 31st December 2016 in Halahala include a receivable of TZS.7,800,000 from Sosomola, and the payables in Sosomola include an amount of TZS.6,000,000 payable to Halahala.  The difference reflects a remittance made at 30th December 2016, not yet received and recorded in Halahala’s books.

 

 

 

REQUIRED:

Prepare the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position of Halahala as at 31st December 2016.                                                                                   (12 marks)

(Total: 20 marks)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SECTION B 

There are FIVE questions. Answer ANY FOUR questions

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

QUESTION  2

 

The Statements of Profit or Loss and either Comprehensive Income and Statements of Financial Position of two manufacturing companies in the same sector are set out below:

 

Statement of Profit or Loss for the year ended 31st December 2016

 

Filo

Mona

 

TZS ‘000’

TZS ‘000’

Revenue

150,000

700,000

Cost of sales

(60,000)

(210,000)

Gross profit

90,000

490,000

Interest payable

(500)

(12,000)

Distribution costs

(13,000)

(72,000)

Administrative expenses

(15,000)

(35,000)

Profit before tax

61,500

371,000

Income tax expense

(16,605)

(100,170)

Profit for the period

44,895

270,830

 

Statement of Financial Position for the year ended 31st December 2016

 

Filo

Mona

 

TZS ‘000’

TZS ‘000’

Assets

 

 

Non-current assets

 

 

Property

 

500,000

Plant and equipment

190,000

280,000

 

190,000

780,000

Current Assets

 

 

Inventories

12,000

26,250

Trade receivables

37,500

105,000

Cash at bank

500

22,000

 

50,000

153,250

Total Assets

240,000

933,250

Equity and liabilities

 

 

Ordinary share capital

156,000

174,750

Retained earnings

51,395

390,830

 

207,395

565,580

Non-current liabilities

 

 

Long-term debt

10,000

250,000

Current liabilities

 

 

Trade payables

22,605

117,670

Total equity and liabilities

240,000

933,250

 

REQUIRED:

 

(a)        Compare the performance of the two companies in terms of profitability, liquidity and efficiency, supporting your arguments with at least two ratios in each case.      

        (14 marks)

(b)        State any FOUR additional pieces of information that would have made your analysis above more useful, clearly indicating the possible added value of such information.                                                                                                     (6 marks)

(Total: 20 marks)

QUESTION 3

 

(a)                    Briefly discuss how do investors commonly use (analyse) free cash flow to value a firm and how best should cash flow statements be disclosed to enable the analysis.

 (5 marks)

 

(b)                   The comparative Statements of Financial Position for Clay Company show the following information:

 

31-12-2016

31-12-2015

 

TZS ‘000’

TZS ‘000’

TZS ‘000’

TZS ‘000’

Non-Current assets

 

 

 

 

Building

0

 

29,750

 

Accumulated depreciation on  building

0

0

6,000

23,750

Equipment

45,000

 

20,000

 

Accumulated depreciation on equipment

2,000

43,000

4,500

15,500

Patent

 

5,000

 

6,250

Total non-current assets

 

48,000

 

45,500

Current Assets

 

 

 

 

Cash

 

33,500

 

13,000

Accounts receivable

12,250

 

10,000

 

Allowance for doubtful accounts

3,000

9,250

4,500

5,500

Inventory

 

12,000

 

9,000

Investments

 

0

 

3,000

Total current assets

 

54,750

 

30,500

Total Assets

 

102,750

 

76,000

Non-current liabilities

 

 

 

 

Long-term notes payable

 

31,000

 

25,000

Total non-current liabilities

 

31,000

 

25,000

Current liabilities

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable

 

5,000

 

3,000

Dividends payable

 

0

 

5,000

Notes payable, short-term (nontrade)

 

3,000

 

4,000

Total current liabilities

 

8,000

 

12,000

Total Liabilities

 

39,000

 

37,000

Equity

 

 

 

 

Common stock

 

43,000

 

33,000

Retained earnings

 

20,750

 

6,000

Total Equity

 

63,750

 

39,000

Total Equity & liabilities

 

102,750

 

76,000

 

Additional data related to 2016 are as follows:

 

(i)                 Equipment that had cost TZS.11,000,000 and was 40% depreciated at time of disposal was sold for TZS.2,500,000.

 

(ii)               TZS.10,000,000 of the long-term note payable was paid by issuing common stock.

 

(iii)             Cash dividends paid were TZS.5,000,000.

 

(iv)             On January 1st 2016, the building was completely destroyed by floods.  Insurance proceeds on the building were TZS.30,000,000 (net of TZS.2,000,000 taxes).

 

(v)               Investments (available-for-sale) were sold at TZS.1,700,000 above their cost.  The company has made similar sales and investments in the past.

 

(vi)             A long-term note for TZS.16,000,000 was issued for the acquisition of equipment, and the remaining balance was acquired in cash.

 

(vii)           Interest of TZS.2,000,000 and income taxes of TZS.6,500,000 were paid in cash.

 

REQUIRED:

 

Prepare a Statement of Cash Flows using indirect method.  Flood damage is unusual and infrequent in that part of the country.                                                 (15 marks)

(Total: 20 marks)

QUESTION 4

 

(a)        IAS 2:  Inventories require that inventories are valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value.

 

            REQUIRED:

 

            State the rationale for such a requirement.                                                   (2 marks)

 

 


(b)        Malyimu retailers had the following figures of reported profit before tax:

           

Year

Profit (TZS)

2014

27,200,000

2015

28,400,000

2016

24,000,000

 

Analysis of inventories shows that certain errors were made with the following results:

Date

Incorrect inventory figure (TZS)

Correct inventory figure (TZS)

December 31, 2014

4,800,000

5,680,000

December 31, 2015

5,600,000

4,680,000

 

 

           

 

 

 

 

REQUIRED:

 

Calculate the corrected profit before tax figures (where applicable) for the years 2014, 2015 and 2016.                                                                                           (6 marks)

 

(c)        Wakali Limited (WL) is engaged in the manufacturing and sale of textile machinery.  The following draft extracts of the Statement of Financial Position and the Statement of Profit or Loss for the year ended 31st December 2016 have been provided:

 

            Statement of Financial Position

 

2016

2015

 

TZS ‘000’

TZS ‘000’

Property, Plant and Equipment

189,000

130,000

Retained earnings

166,000

108,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

            Statement of Profit or Loss

 

2016

2015

 

TZS ‘000’

TZS ‘000’

Profit before taxation

90,000

120,000

Taxation

27,000

 36,000

Profit after taxation

63,000

84,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

            The following additional information has not been taken into account in the preparation of the above financial statements:

·               Cost of repairs amounting to TZS.20 million was erroneously debited to the machinery account on 1st April 2015.  The estimated useful life of the machine is 10 years.

 

·               On 1st January 2016, WL reviewed the estimated useful life of its plant and revised it from 5 years to 7 years.  The plant was purchased on 1st January 2014 at a cost of TZS.70 million.

 

Depreciation is provided under the straight line method.  Applicable tax rate is 30%.

 

REQUIRED:

 

Prepare relevant extracts (including 2015 comparatives) for the year ended 31st December 2016 related to the following:

 

(i)              Statement of Financial Position.                                                       (6 marks)

(ii)               Statement of Profit or Loss.                                                            (6 marks)

                                                                                   (Total: 20 marks)

QUESTION 5

 

(a)             Damari Limited is a company involved in building wind farms in Singida.  The financial controller has asked you, a newly qualified CPA for some help in correctly accounting for Property, Plant and Equipment (PPE) within the company for the financial year ended 31st December 2016.

 

The following costs have occurred on a wind farm site:

 

 

TZS ‘000’

Preparation of site

80,000

Annual maintenance once operational

30,000

VAT on materials (recoverable)

120,000

Staff training on  correctly operating the wind farm once operational

25,000

Import duty on materials purchased

28,000

Initial surveying of site

40,000

Project manager’s salary to build and manage the wind farm

140,000

Wages of employees to build the wind farm

300,000

Annual wages of employees once the wind farm is operating

100,000

Testing costs

60,000

Materials purchased for wind farm net of VAT

250,000

Discount received on materials purchased

33,000

 

REQUIRED:

 

(i)                 Calculate the amount that should be capitalized as Property, Plant and   Equipment for the above wind farm.                                                 (3 marks)

 

(ii)     In accordance with IAS 16 – Property, Plant & Equipment explain the accounting treatment allowed for the measurement of PPE:

a.                   At recognition;                                                                   (1.5 marks)

b.                  After recognition.                                                              (1.5 marks)

 

(iii)                   In the context of IAS 16 – Property, Plant & Equipment:

a.                   Discuss what is meant by the term ‘fair value’.                 (1.5 marks)

b.                  How can the fair value of a building be determined?       (1.5 marks)

 

(b)   Damari Limited’s head office building is the only building it owns.  Using professional valuers, it revalued this building on 1st January 2016, at TZS.2,100,000,000.  Damari Limited has adopted a revaluation policy for building from this valuation date and has decided that the original useful life of buildings has not changed as a result of the revaluation.  The building was acquired on 1st January 2006.  The cost of the building on acquisition was TZS.2,500,000,000 and the accumulated depreciation to 31st December 2015 amounted to TZS. 500,000,000. The depreciation up to 1st January 2016 was depreciated evenly since acquisition.  The professional valuer believes that the residual value on the building would be TZS.600,000,000 at the end of its useful life.

 

 

REQUIRED:

 

In accordance with IAS 16 – Property, Plant & Equipment:

(i)                 State how should the depreciable amount of an asset be allocated.

(1 mark)

(ii)               State how often should the residual value and the useful life of an

 asset be reviewed.                                                                             (2 marks)

 

(iii)             Calculate the depreciation amount of the building for the year ended 31st December 2016 based on the information provided in the above scenario.       

                                                                                                           (8 marks)

(Total: 20 marks)

QUESTION 6

 

 

(a)        Consider the following list of events that occurred between 31st December 2016 (reporting date) and 31st March 2017 (date of authorization of financial statement for issue) and decide which one you would classify as adjusting events and which are non-adjusting events.  You should also state clearly the treatment that you are proposing in each case.

 

(i)                 The receipt of net proceeds of sales TZS.12,600,000 for inventory items whose net realizable value was estimated (31st December 2016) at TZS.12,000,000 and cost was TZS.12,500,000.

 

(ii)               Proposed dividend made by the director’s board meeting on 31st January 2017, for a total of TZS.160,000,000.

 

(iii)             Enactment in February 2017 of a new customer protection law that requires the company to enhance disclosures in labels on its products (including translating them to Kiswahili language).  This, apart from increasing labelling costs, makes labels costing the company TZS.14,000,000 useless.

 

(iv)             The declaration of bankruptcy for a debtor. An allowance of TZS.15,000,000 was set against his doubtful debt at 31st December 2016.  The total amount receivable before the allowance was TZS 42,000,000 and as a result of the bankruptcy declaration directors estimate that only TZS.12,000,000 can be recovered.

 

(v)               The chairman of the board of directors got appointed on 1st January 2017 as a member of parliament (by the president). The appointment automatically requires him to relinquish her position as board member and chair.  Processes to fill her position in the board are estimated to cost TZS.15,000,000.                                                                                               

Your answer should be in the following format:

Item

Classification

Treatment

(i)

 

 

(ii)

 

 

(iii)

 

 

(iv)

 

 

(v)

 

 

 

            (10 marks) 

               

(b)        Gambini Company is preparing its Financial Statements for the year ended 31st December 2016.

 

The following matters are all outstanding at the year end.

 

(i)                 Gambini is facing litigation for damages from a customer for the supply of faulty goods on 1st December 2016.  The claim which is for TZS. 500,000,000, was received on 15th January 2017.  Gambini’s legal advisors consider that Gambini is liable and it is likely that this claim will succeed.  On 25th January 2017, Gambini sent a counter-claim to its suppliers for TZS.400,000,000.  Gambini’s legal advisors are unsure whether or not this claim will succeed.

 

(ii)               Gambini’s sales director, who was dismissed on 15th December 2016, has lodged a claim for TZS.100,000,000 for unfair dismissal.  Gambini’s legal advisors believe that there is no case to answer and therefore think it is unlikely that this claim will succeed.

 

(iii)             Although Gambini has no legal obligation to do so, it has habitually operated a policy of allowing customers to return goods within 28 days, even where those goods are not faulty.  Gambini estimates that such returns usually amount to 1% of sales.  Sales in December 2016 were TZS.400,000,000. By the end of January 2017, prior to the drafting of the financial statements, goods sold in December for TZS.3,500,000  had been returned.

 

(iv)             On 15th December 2016 Gambini announced in the press that it is to close one of its divisions in April 2017.  A detailed closure plan is in place and the costs of closure are reliably estimated at TZS.300,000,000, including TZS.50,000,000 for staff relocation.

 

REQUIRED:

 

State, with reasons, how the above matters should be treated in Gambini’s financial statements for the year ended 31st December 2016.                                    (10 marks)

                                                                                                                    (Total: 20 marks)

___________p___________


 

SUGGESTED SOLUTIONS

B2 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING

MAY 2017

 

ANSWER   1

 

(a)        Control and Consolidation.

           

(i)                 Control

An investor controls an investee when it is exposed, or has rights, to variable returns from its involvement with the investee and has the ability to affect those returns through its power over the investee.                                             

 

In other words, the investor has control over the investee when it has all of the following:

 

§     Power over the investee

§     Exposure, or rights, to variable returns from its involvement with the

investee; and

§     The ability to use its power over the investee to affect the amount of the investor’s returns.                                                                       

 

(ii)               Consolidated

The full consolidation is justified by the control that the parent entity has over the assets of the subsidiary.  The definition of assets speaks of control rather than ownership, thus even if an entity literally owns less than 100% of another entity, as long as it has control over such entity, it should report the assets of such entity as assets of the group.                                                                      

 

(b)        Halahala

           

            Halahala Group

            Consolidated Statement of Financial Position as at 31 December 2016

           

 

          TZS ‘000’

Assets

 

Non-current assets

 

Property, plant and equipment

 

(152,000 + 129,600 + 28,000 (W1))

309,600

Goodwill (W2)

36,840

Current assets

 

Bank (41,000 + 8,000 +1,800)

50,800

Receivables (104,000 + 84,000 – 7,800)

180,200

Inventory (112,000 + 74,400 – 3,200 (W6))

183,200

 

          760,640


 

Equity and liabilities

 

Capital and reserves

 

Share capital

100,00

Retained earnings (W4)

530,640

 

          630,640

Non-controlling interest (W3)

60,000

Current liabilities (52,000 + 24,000 – 6,000)

   70,000

 

760,640

               

WORKINGS

 

1.            Net assets of Sosomola

 

 

 

Reporting date  TZS ‘000’

Acquisition date  TZS ‘000’

Post acquisition TZS ‘000’

Share capital

160,000

160,000

 

FV adj. on Land

28,000

28,000

 

Retained earnings

112,000

(11,000)

123,000

 

300,000

177,000

 

 

 

 

 

2.  Goodwill

 

 

 

 

 

 

TZS ‘000’

Cost of shares

 

 

203,000

Less Net assets acquired (80%  x 177,000 (W1))

(141,600)

 

61,400

Less: Impairment [40%]

24,560

Goodwill at 31/12/2016

36,840

 

 

 

 

3.  Non-controlling interest

 

 

 

 

  TZS ‘000’

Share of net assets (20%  x 300,000 (W1))

60,000

 

 

 

 

4.  Retained  earnings

 

 

 

 

TZS ‘000’

Halahala

 

460,000

Prov for Unrealized Profit (W5)

(3,200)

Sosomola’s post acq. RE (80%  x 123,000 (W1))

98,400

Goodwill impairment

 

(24,560)

 

 

530,640

 

 

 

5.  Unrealised Profits

 

 

Selling price           %

TZS ‘000’

 

Cost                     125

16,000

 

GP                     (100)

(12,800)

 

                             25

3,200

 

 


 

 

 

 

ANSWER 2

 

(a)    Comparative performance of Filo and Mona

 

Profitability:

Mona’s figures shows overall higher profitability ratios than Filo both in relation to sales and in relation to assets or investments. This is further confirmed by its ability to efficiently use assets [see the stock turn rate and the return on assets]

This could suggest Mona’s ability to both

  • Attract premium paying customers
  • Manage operating costs

 

Liquidity:

Filo’s ratios portrays greater liquidity compared to Mona. While this may be a good indicator of a stronger liquidity position in favour of Filo, it could also suggest efficient use of resources by Mona, by avoiding to keep excessive idle liquid assets, since it still has an adequate liquidity to meet maturing obligation [ a quick ratio just above 1]. The efficiency is further confirmed by the efficiency ratios

 

Efficiency:

Mona’s ratios, again, portrays better efficiency than Filo’s. Despite giving longer credit period to its customers, Filo still proves less efficient in ‘turning over’ the stocks.

Generally, therefore, staying within the information given, between the two companies, Mona has a better performance than Filo.

Supporting computations:

 

Relevant ratios

Formula

Filo

Mona

Profitability

Gross margin

Gross profit/ Sales

60%

70%

Profit margin

Profit before interest and Tax/ Sales

41.33%

54.71%

Return on Assets

Profit before interest and Tax/ Total Assets

25.83%

41.04%

Liquidity

Current ratio

2.2119

1.302371

times

Quick ratio

1.68

1.08

times

Efficiency

Rate of stock turnover

Cost of sales/ average stock

5

8

times

Debtors collection period

(Debtors *365 days)/sales

91.25

54.75

days

Assets Turnover

Sales/ total assets

0.625

0.750067

times

 


(b)   Additional information needed in the analysis, and the indicative possible added value

  • They number of years each of the companies have been in operation – could tell whether Mona is enjoying learning curve as compared to Filo. It could also be that Filo is in the entry phase, thus having to adopt market penetration strategies

 

  • The nature of customers served - Much as they are both manufacturers, one could be concentrating on corporate customers and another small scale customers. These will affect the margins and efficiencies

 

  • The trend of performance for the past years - This information could indicate whether the current year performance is typical of the performance in the past few years, or reflects improving/ worsening performance

 

§  Industry averages - This information could assist in gauging the performance against peers in the industry.

 

ANSWER 3

 

(a)        For many investors, the core concept in estimating free cash flow is the excess of a company’s operating cash flows over its capital expenditure.  Applying free cash flow in intrinsic valuation methods, such as a discounted cash flow model (DCF), is often considered to more appropriate than simply using the disclosed operating cash flow.  This is because it considers the cash flows available to owners after funding the investment (or reinvestment) needs of the business.  To enable this analysis to be as precise as possible, companies are encouraged to disclose separately cash flows that increase operating capacity and those required to maintain it (some investors refer to this as ‘maintenance capex’ vs ‘growth capex’).  As well, these measures of a company’s cash flow can be used as an indicator of financial strength, which may be useful to investors analyzing a company’s ability to repay debt.                                                                         

 

            CLAY CORPORATION

 

            Statement of Cash Flows

            For the Year Ended December 31, 2016

Cash flows from operating activities

TZS.‘000’

TZS.‘000’

Net income (a)

 

14,750

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities

 

 

   Loss on sale of equipment (b)

 4,100

 

 Gain from flood damage [(TZS30,000 + 2,000) –   29,750 - 6,000)]

-8,250

 

   Depreciation expense (c)

1,900

 

   Patent amortization

1,250

 

   Gain on sale of investments

-1,700

 

   Increase in Accts Rec (net) [(TZS12,250 –   

   TZS3,000) – (TZS10,000 – TZS4,500)]

-3,750

 

   Increase in inventory

-3,000

 

  Increase in accounts payable

2,000

-7,450

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

TZS7,300

 

 

 

Cash flows from investing activities

 

 

   Sale of investments

TZS4,700

 

   Sale of equipment

2,500

 

   Purchase of equipment (d)

-20,000

 

   Proceeds from flood damage to building

32,000

 

Net cash provided by investing activities

 

TZS 19,200

 

 

 

Cash flow from financing activities

 

 

   Payment of dividends

(TZS5,000)

 

   Payment of short-term note payable

-1,000

 

Net cash used by financing activities

 

(TZS6,000)

 

 

 

Increase in cash

 

TZS20,500

Cash January 1,2016

13,000

 

Cash, December 31, 2016

TZS33,500

 

 

 

 

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information

 

 

Cash paid during the year for:

 

 

   Interest

TZS2,000

 

   Income taxes

6,500

 

 

 

 

Noncash investing and financing activities

 

 

   Retired note payable by issuing common stock

TZS10,000

 

   Purchased equipment by issuing note payable

16,000

 

 

TZS26,000

 

 

 

 

Supporting Computations:

 

 

(a)     Ending retained earnings

TZS20,750

 

 Beginning retained earnings

-6,000

 

Net income

TZS14,750

 

 

 

 

(b)     Cost

TZS 11,000

 

   Accumulated depreciation (40% x TZS11,000

-4,400

 

   Book value

6,600

 

   Proceeds from sale

-2,500

 

   Loss on sale

TZS4,100

 

 

 

 

(c)      Accumulated depreciation on equipment sold

TZS 4,400

 

  Decrease in accumulated depreciation

-2,500

 

  Depreciation expense

TZS1,900

 

 

 

 

(d)     Beginning equipment balance

TZS 20,000

 

  Cost of equipment sold

-11,000

 

  Remaining balance

9,000

 

 


ANSWER 4

 

(a)        Rationale for the ‘lower of cost or NRV valuation principle

            The rationale is to avoid reporting inventory as an asset at a value that is higher than what they can really generate to the reporting entity.  This is in line with the basic element of the definition of an asset, i.e. the probable flow of economic benefits to the entity.

 

 (b)       Malyim

 

            In this situation, we have:

            Year

Opening stock

Closing stock

Net effect profit

Correction required

2013

NIL

880,000 understated

880,000 understated

Add 880,000 to the reported profit

2014

880,000 understated

920,000 overstated

1,800,000 overstated

Deduct 1,800,000 from the reported profit

2015

920,000 overstated

NIL

920,000 understated

Add 920,000 to the reported profit

 

            The corrected profit figures are thus:

Year

Original Profit

TZS

Correction required

Corrected profit TZS

2013

27,200,000

Add 880,000 to the reported profit

28,080,000

2014

28,400,000

Deduct 1,800,000 from the reported profit

26,600,000

2015

24,000,000

Add 920,000 to the reported profit

24,920,000

 

(c)        Wakali

 

            Extracts of statement of financial position as at:

           

31-Dec-16

TZS

31-Dec-15

TZS

PPE

 

 

Original figure

189,000,000

130,000,000

Wrong capitalized repair cost

(20,000,000)

(20,000,000)

Accumulated depr on wrongly capitalized repair cost

3,500,000

1,500,000

Extra depreciation charged

4,000,000

-

 

176,500,000

111,500,000

Retained earnings

157,250,000

95,050,000

           

Extracts of statement of Profit/loss for the year ended:

           

31-Dec-16

TZS

31-Dec-15

TZS

Profit before tax-originally reported

90,000,000

120,000,000

Wrongly capitalized repair cost

-

(20,000,000)

Extra depreciation (TZS4m + 2m)

6,000,000

1,500,000

Corrected profit before tax

96,000,000

101,500,000

Taxation

28,800,000

30,450,000

Profit after tax

67,200,000

71,050,000

 


Workings 1:  Extra depreciation                

Plant cost

70,000,000

Original useful life

5 years

Revised useful life

7 years

Depreciation charge before change

14,000,000

Depreciation charge after change

10,000,000

Extra depreciation charged 2016

4,000,000

 

Workings 2:  PAT                

Profit after tax figures

63,000,000

84,000,000

Wrongly capitalize repair cost

-

(20,000,000)

Extra depreciation

6,000,000

1,500,000

After Tax implications of the corrections

4,200,000

(12,950,000)

Corrected after tax figure

67,200,000

71,050,000

 

Workings 3:  Retained earnings correction                       

 

TZS

TZS

Originally reported

166,000,000

108,000,000

Effect of PAT adjustment

(8,750,000)

(12,950,000)

Corrected Retained earnings figure

157,250,000

95,050,000

 

ANSWER 5

 

(a)       

REPORT

 

To:  Financial Controller – Damari Limited

 

From:  Future Financial Accountant

 

RE:  IAS 16 – Property, Plant & Equipment (PPE)

 

Date:  April 2016

 

(i)     The amount that can be capitalized for this wind farm is as follows:

TZS‘000’

Preparation of site 80,000 Yes

80,000

Annual maintenance once operational 30,000 no

 

Vat on material (recoverable) 120,000 no

 

Staff training on correctly operating the wind farm once operational 25,000 no

 

Import duty on materials purchased 28,000 Yes

28,000

Initial surveying of site 40,000 Yes

40,000

Project manager salary to build and manage the wind farm 140,000 Yes

140,000

Wages of employees to build wind farm 300,000 Yes

300,000

Annual wages of employees once the wind farm is operating 100,000 no

 

Testing costs 60,000 Yes

60,000

Materials purchased for wind farm net of vat 250,000 Yes

250,000

Discount received on materials purchased 33,000 Yes

(33,000)

Amount to be Capitalised

865,000

 

(ii)  a.   Per paragraph 15 of IAS 16 at initial recognition, all items of PPE are recognized at cost.

                                                                                                                                                                                                      

       b.  Per paragraph 29 of IAS, two methods of valuing PPE after initial recognition are allowed. i.e.

                                                                                                                                                                                                 

(iii)  a. Cost model i.e. PPE is carried at cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment   

            losses

 

b. Revaluation model i.e. PPE is carried at a revalued amount.  The revalued amount is equal  

    to the fair value at date of revaluation less subsequent accumulated depreciation and   

    impairment losses.

 

(b)

 

(i)                 Per paragraph 6 of IAS 16, it should be allocated over its useful life          

(ii)               Per paragraph 51 of IAs 16 16, the residual value and the useful life of an asset shall be reviewed at least at each financial year end and if expectations differ from previous estimates, the change(s) shall be accounted for as a change in an accounting estimate in accordance with IAS 8 Accounting Policies, changes in Accounting estimates an errors.       

                

(iii)             The depreciation amount is as follows:

           

Working – Property, Plant & Equipment

      Building

   Total

Cost

2,500,0000

2,500,000

-Accumulated depreciation

(500,000)

(500,000)

Carrying Value b/d at 1st January 2015

2,000,000

2,000,000

Revaluation Gain

100,000

100,000

 

2,100,000

2,100,000

Depreciation-building-note1

(37,500)

(37,500)

Carrying Value c/d at 31st December 2015

2,062,500

2,062,500

 

            Note 1

            Buildings – original Cost                                         2,500,000

            Buildings – original Accumulated depreciation         500,000

            Accumulated depreciation/Cost = 20%         

Building has been depreciated by 20% over 10 years (01.01.05 – 31.12.14) so annual rate of depreciation has been 2% i.e. 20% /10 years as asset has been depreciated evenly since acquisition.  Therefore, the original useful life is 50 years i.e. 100%/2% and the remaining useful life is 40 years.  Therefore, the remaining useful life is 40 years.

To calculate the new depreciation amount, we use the following depreciation formula revalued Cost of Asset – residual value i.e. 2,100,000 – 600,000 expected useful life of Asset 40 years depreciation = 37,500.

If you have any further queries, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Yours sincerely,

Financial Accountant


ANSWER 6

 

(a)        Classification of events and respective treatments

 

Item

IAS 10 classification

Treatment

 (i)

Adjusting

Restate the inventory to cost, i.e. TZS 12,500,000 as it is lower than the NRV

(ii)

Non adjusting

Disclose in the notes

(iii)

Non adjusting

Do nothing, the loss [obsolete labels] will be expenses in 2017.

(iv)

Adjusting

Adjust the allowance for doubtful debt to TZS 30,000,000

(v)

Non-adjusting

Do nothing

 

(b)       Gambini Ltd

           

(i)                 Customer Litigation – damage

§    Gambini’s legal advisors have confirmed that there is a legal obligation.  This arose from the past event of the sale, on 1 December 2016 (i.e. before the year-en).                                                                      

§    The legal advisors have confirmed that it is likely that the claim will succeed.                                                                                 

§    A reliable estimate of TZS 500,000,000 has been made.               

§    Therefore, a provision of TZS 500,000,000 should be made.        

§    About the Counter-claim, IAS37 requires that such a reimbursement should only be recognized where receipt is ‘virtually certain’.  Since the legal advisors are unsure whether this claim will succeed no asset should be recognized in respect of this claim.                                       

 

(ii)               Sales director suit – unfair dismissal

In this case, the legal advisers believe that success is unlikely (ie. Possible rather than probable).  Therefore, this claim meets the IAS37 definition of a contingent liability.  The liability is a possible one, which will be determined by a future court case or tribunal.  It did arise from past events (the dismissal had taken place by the year end).                                                                                    

 

This contingent liability should be disclosed in the financial statements (unless the legal advisors believe that the possibility of success is in fact remote, in which case no disclosure would be necessary.                                  

 

(iii)             Customers’ returns

Although there is no legal obligation, a constructive obligation arises from Gambini’s past actions.  Gambini has created an expectation in its customers that such refunds will be given.                                                                             

 

As at the year end, based on past experience, an outflow of economic benefits is probable.                                                                                                    

 

A reliable estimate can be made.  This could be 1% x 400,000,000 but since the returns are now all in the actual figure of TZS 3,500,000 can be used. 

 

Therefore, a provision of TZS 3,500,000 should be made.                  

 

(iv)             Closure announcement

§   A present obligation exists because at the year-end there is a detailed plan in place and the closure has been announced in the press.                             

§   An outflow of economic benefits is probable.                                 

§   A reliable estimate of TZS 300,000,000 has been made.                 

§   However, IAS37 specifically states in respect of restructuring that any provision should include only direct expenses, not ongoing expenses such as staff relocation or retraining (paragraph 80 and 81).  Therefore, a provision of TZS 250,000,000(300,000,000) – 50,000,000) should be made.      

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

______________    5    ______________

 

 

 

 

 

No comments:

Post a Comment